<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objective-C is confusing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickardandersson.com/objective-c-is-confusing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickardandersson.com/objective-c-is-confusing</link>
	<description>The general consensus among clients is that they are your only client.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19719</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickard</title>
		<link>http://rickardandersson.com/objective-c-is-confusing#comment-60282</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickardandersson.com/?p=145#comment-60282</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess it&#039;s only a mess if you&#039;re used to something different. Reference counting is indeed a hassle. I almost prefer old-fashioned malloc/free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess it&#8217;s only a mess if you&#8217;re used to something different. Reference counting is indeed a hassle. I almost prefer old-fashioned malloc/free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Rosenstark</title>
		<link>http://rickardandersson.com/objective-c-is-confusing#comment-60281</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rosenstark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickardandersson.com/?p=145#comment-60281</guid>
		<description>Why is it a mess? Syntax is totally arbitrary. Lots of people love this bracketed stuff. I am not one of them, yet, but syntax is just syntax. Reference counting, on the other hand, requires work and is a huge hassle. But apparently that&#039;s necessary to keep it light (doubt it, though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it a mess? Syntax is totally arbitrary. Lots of people love this bracketed stuff. I am not one of them, yet, but syntax is just syntax. Reference counting, on the other hand, requires work and is a huge hassle. But apparently that&#8217;s necessary to keep it light (doubt it, though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satta</title>
		<link>http://rickardandersson.com/objective-c-is-confusing#comment-59031</link>
		<dc:creator>satta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickardandersson.com/?p=145#comment-59031</guid>
		<description>hey mate, how did the progressive C development go? i&#039;m thinking of getting into it, if i can integrate it into my visual studio but was it hard to get over?

the syntax you posted looked pretty weird considering its supposed to be like C or C#!

sat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey mate, how did the progressive C development go? i&#8217;m thinking of getting into it, if i can integrate it into my visual studio but was it hard to get over?</p>
<p>the syntax you posted looked pretty weird considering its supposed to be like C or C#!</p>
<p>sat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

